tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12075435.post111660029247200062..comments2009-07-10T00:12:52.289+01:00Comments on Becky's T-Blog: GenderTalkBeckyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01046573566773689909noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12075435.post-1117179953730168322005-05-27T08:45:00.000+01:002005-05-27T08:45:00.000+01:00honestly... i think its closed minds and smaller p...honestly... i think its closed minds and smaller penises that cause such a fuss over crossdressing in america... that and perhaps that most drag queens look better than the girls:D baaaa zing:D but i do live in the US... im a prisoner... SEND HELP!!! hihihi but i digress... over 49 percent of the country is open and accepting... but these small influential sects of religious intolerants greatly make living difficult for those of self ambulatory thinking... sheep they are... Dyed in the wool ignorance... i lost my first boyfriend, of 4 years, to this sort of moral thinking... its sad that these moralists, how a disgrace to the word 'moralist', of such disturbed thought and action are allowed in society... somehow they feel personally responsible for our souls... sold mine... twice... but still they wish to suffer through life to get to heaven... to that i say send my to hell so that i may be in better company... sincerely and always a queen... a cute one... not like the queen of england... sorry but god save the queen... from her own reflection... terribly sorry:D queers mate:D oh and thanks for queer as folk... love the show... our version is better... but it was still your idea:D hahaha kisses:Dthe phantom diva of dot-comhttp://page???noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12075435.post-1116936510819547932005-05-24T13:08:00.000+01:002005-05-24T13:08:00.000+01:00Well on a programme about motorbikes the other nig...Well on a programme about motorbikes the other night, it turned out that two women rode across the US in 1916 to show women could be depatch riders.<BR/>They got arrested on the way, not for speeding but for wearing trousers.In Victorian England too, and even in the first half of the 20th century, a woman wearing trousers would have been ostracised. All we want is quid-pro-quo I guess. Like many other things, expectations of dress are a mobile part of the public consciousness.<BR/><BR/>Susan 2Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12075435.post-1116666240117891062005-05-21T10:04:00.000+01:002005-05-21T10:04:00.000+01:00I may be wrong, but "Dyed in the wool" surely hone...I may be wrong, but "<EM>Dyed</EM> in the wool" surely honey? ;)<BR/><BR/>It is truly bizarre that the <I>police</I> get called in response to a guy wearing a dress. It makes you wonder exactly what happeed in the lead-up to that. Was it just "Hey! Brad's wearing a frock! Call the cops!", or did other stuff happen?<BR/><BR/>But I think, in regards to "activisim", that there's a lot of well-meaning stuff going on - but the majority of it is misplaced. A lot of the 'TG Rights' stuff is about three decades too late, and it fails to take into account the change in attitudes and politics that has happened since the sixties.<BR/><BR/>I ranted myself to sleep on the very same subject last night, and I'm going to try and expand on it at some point, but basically, I think it comes down to:<BR/><BR/>The World = Postmodern, Trannies = ModernistSiobhan Curranhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09838174307202481837noreply@blogger.com